1999 AC Aceca vs. 2000 Ford ST 460
To start off, 2000 Ford ST 460 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 AC Aceca would be higher. At 4,942 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford ST 460 (460 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 138 more horse power than 1999 AC Aceca. (322 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford ST 460 should accelerate faster than 1999 AC Aceca.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 AC Aceca (532 Nm) has 354 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford ST 460. (178 Nm). This means 1999 AC Aceca will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford ST 460.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 AC Aceca | 2000 Ford ST 460 | |
| Make | AC | Ford |
| Model | Aceca | ST 460 |
| Year Released | 1999 | 2000 |
| Engine Size | 4942 cc | 4600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 322 HP | 460 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 6150 RPM |
| Torque | 532 Nm | 178 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4620 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1830 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2580 mm |
