1999 AC Aceca vs. 2013 Mini Countryman
To start off, 2013 Mini Countryman is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 AC Aceca would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 AC Aceca weights approximately 170 kg more than 2013 Mini Countryman.
Because 1999 AC Aceca is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 AC Aceca. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mini Countryman, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 AC Aceca (407 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 252 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mini Countryman. (155 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 1999 AC Aceca will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mini Countryman.
Compare all specifications:
1999 AC Aceca | 2013 Mini Countryman | |
Make | AC | Mini |
Model | Aceca | Countryman |
Year Released | 1999 | 2013 |
Body Type | Convertible | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 301 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 407 Nm | 155 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1510 kg | 1340 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4097 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1993 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1561 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2595 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 47 L |