1999 Audi A3 vs. 1964 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1999 Audi A3 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Cadillac 62 (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 107 more horse power than 1999 Audi A3. (101 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1999 Audi A3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 890 kg more than 1999 Audi A3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Audi A3 | 1964 Cadillac 62 | |
Make | Audi | Cadillac |
Model | A3 | 62 |
Year Released | 1999 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1595 cc | 7029 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 101 HP | 208 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1140 kg | 2030 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 5690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 3300 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 75 L |