1999 Audi RS4 vs. 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Audi RS4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Audi RS4 would be higher. At 3,965 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Audi RS4 (250 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (195 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Audi RS4 should accelerate faster than 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 279 kg more than 1999 Audi RS4.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Audi RS4 | 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
Make | Audi | Jeep |
Model | RS4 | Grand Cherokee |
Year Released | 1999 | 2004 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2671 cc | 3965 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 195 HP |
Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 81.1 mm | 99 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 8.8:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1620 kg | 1899 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 78 L |