1999 BMW V12 vs. 2009 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2009 Cadillac CTS is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 BMW V12. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 BMW V12 would be higher. At 5,990 cc (12 cylinders), 1999 BMW V12 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 BMW V12 (550 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 291 more horse power than 2009 Cadillac CTS. (259 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 BMW V12 should accelerate faster than 2009 Cadillac CTS.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 BMW V12 (909 Nm) has 656 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Cadillac CTS. (253 Nm). This means 1999 BMW V12 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Cadillac CTS. 1999 BMW V12 has automatic transmission and 2009 Cadillac CTS has manual transmission. 2009 Cadillac CTS will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 BMW V12 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1999 BMW V12 | 2009 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | BMW | Cadillac |
Model | V12 | CTS |
Year Released | 1999 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 5990 cc | 3564 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 550 HP | 259 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 909 Nm | 253 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 1 seats | 5 seats |