1999 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1983 Plymouth Reliant
To start off, 1999 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Plymouth Reliant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Plymouth Reliant would be higher. At 3,390 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 263 kg more than 1983 Plymouth Reliant.
Because 1999 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Plymouth Reliant, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Chevrolet Camaro | 1983 Plymouth Reliant | |
Make | Chevrolet | Plymouth |
Model | Camaro | Reliant |
Year Released | 1999 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3390 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1413 kg | 1150 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2260 mm |