1999 Citroen C3 vs. 2008 Smart Ultimate 112
To start off, 2008 Smart Ultimate 112 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Citroen C3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Citroen C3 would be higher. In terms of performance, 2008 Smart Ultimate 112 (110 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1999 Citroen C3. (90 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Smart Ultimate 112 should accelerate faster than 1999 Citroen C3.
Because 2008 Smart Ultimate 112 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 Smart Ultimate 112. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Citroen C3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Smart Ultimate 112 (151 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 16 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Citroen C3. (135 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2008 Smart Ultimate 112 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Citroen C3.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Citroen C3 | 2008 Smart Ultimate 112 | |
| Make | Citroen | Smart |
| Model | C3 | Ultimate 112 |
| Year Released | 1999 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Horse Power | 90 HP | 110 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5750 RPM |
| Torque | 135 Nm | 151 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2800 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1570 mm |
