1999 Dodge Charger vs. 1964 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1999 Dodge Charger is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 4,700 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Dodge Charger (321 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 232 more horse power than 1964 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Dodge Charger should accelerate faster than 1964 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Dodge Charger weights approximately 192 kg more than 1964 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Dodge Charger | 1964 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Dodge | Triumph |
Model | Charger | 2000 |
Year Released | 1999 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4700 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 321 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1362 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 4760 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 64 L |