1999 Ford 021 C vs. 1959 Ford Fairlane
To start off, 1999 Ford 021 C is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 5,769 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1959 Ford Fairlane (168 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 68 more horse power than 1999 Ford 021 C. (100 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1959 Ford Fairlane should accelerate faster than 1999 Ford 021 C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 796 kg more than 1999 Ford 021 C. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1959 Ford Fairlane is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Ford Fairlane. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Ford 021 C, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Ford 021 C | 1959 Ford Fairlane | |
| Make | Ford | Ford |
| Model | 021 C | Fairlane |
| Year Released | 1999 | 1959 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1596 cc | 5769 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 168 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1298 kg | 2094 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3610 mm | 5260 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 3000 mm |
