1999 Ford Econoline vs. 1992 Mitsubishi Space Runner
To start off, 1999 Ford Econoline is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Mitsubishi Space Runner. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Mitsubishi Space Runner would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Ford Econoline (197 HP @ 4700 RPM) has 116 more horse power than 1992 Mitsubishi Space Runner. (81 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Ford Econoline should accelerate faster than 1992 Mitsubishi Space Runner. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Ford Econoline weights approximately 1065 kg more than 1992 Mitsubishi Space Runner. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1999 Ford Econoline is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Ford Econoline. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Mitsubishi Space Runner, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Ford Econoline (338 Nm @ 2700 RPM) has 163 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Mitsubishi Space Runner. (175 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1999 Ford Econoline will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Mitsubishi Space Runner.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Ford Econoline | 1992 Mitsubishi Space Runner | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | Econoline | Space Runner |
Year Released | 1999 | 1992 |
Body Type | Van | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 81 HP |
Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 338 Nm | 175 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 2325 kg | 1260 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2530 mm |