1999 Ford Falcon vs. 2012 Opel Combo

To start off, 2012 Opel Combo is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 3,984 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Ford Falcon (232 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 143 more horse power than 2012 Opel Combo. (89 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 2012 Opel Combo.

Because 1999 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Opel Combo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Ford Falcon (374 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 248 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Opel Combo. (126 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1999 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Opel Combo.

Compare all specifications:

1999 Ford Falcon 2012 Opel Combo
Make Ford Opel
Model Falcon Combo
Year Released 1999 2012
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3984 cc 1364 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 232 HP 89 HP
Engine RPM 5000 RPM 5600 RPM
Torque 374 Nm 126 Nm
Torque RPM 3500 RPM 4000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 92.3 mm 73.4 mm
Engine Stroke Size 99.3 mm 80.6 mm
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 2 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 3 doors
Vehicle Length 4910 mm 4330 mm
Vehicle Width 1880 mm 1810 mm
Vehicle Height 1420 mm 1690 mm
Wheelbase Size 2840 mm 2720 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 68 L 52 L