1999 Mazda Laputa vs. 2005 SsangYong Rodius
To start off, 2005 SsangYong Rodius is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Mazda Laputa. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Mazda Laputa would be higher. At 2,696 cc (5 cylinders), 2005 SsangYong Rodius is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 SsangYong Rodius (161 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 108 more horse power than 1999 Mazda Laputa. (53 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 SsangYong Rodius should accelerate faster than 1999 Mazda Laputa. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 SsangYong Rodius weights approximately 1467 kg more than 1999 Mazda Laputa. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 SsangYong Rodius is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1999 Mazda Laputa. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 SsangYong Rodius will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 SsangYong Rodius (342 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 279 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Mazda Laputa. (63 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2005 SsangYong Rodius will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Mazda Laputa. 2005 SsangYong Rodius has automatic transmission and 1999 Mazda Laputa has manual transmission. 1999 Mazda Laputa will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 SsangYong Rodius will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Mazda Laputa | 2005 SsangYong Rodius | |
Make | Mazda | SsangYong |
Model | Laputa | Rodius |
Year Released | 1999 | 2005 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 658 cc | 2696 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 161 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 63 Nm | 342 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 68 mm | 86.2 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 60.4 mm | 92.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 18.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 750 kg | 2217 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 5130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1920 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 3010 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 80 L |