1999 Nissan C 52 vs. 2005 Renault Clio
To start off, 2005 Renault Clio is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Nissan C 52. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Nissan C 52 would be higher. At 3,496 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Nissan C 52 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Nissan C 52 (152 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 2005 Renault Clio. (73 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Nissan C 52 should accelerate faster than 2005 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Nissan C 52 weights approximately 101 kg more than 2005 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1999 Nissan C 52 (354 Nm) has 249 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Renault Clio. (105 Nm). This means 1999 Nissan C 52 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Renault Clio. 1999 Nissan C 52 has automatic transmission and 2005 Renault Clio has manual transmission. 2005 Renault Clio will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 Nissan C 52 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Nissan C 52 | 2005 Renault Clio | |
Make | Nissan | Renault |
Model | C 52 | Clio |
Year Released | 1999 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 3496 cc | 1460 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 152 HP | 73 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 354 Nm | 105 Nm |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 1 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1266 kg | 1165 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2630 mm |