1999 Nissan R 391 vs. 2010 Mercedes-Benz CLC
To start off, 2010 Mercedes-Benz CLC is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Nissan R 391. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Nissan R 391 would be higher. At 4,997 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Nissan R 391 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mercedes-Benz CLC (181 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 1999 Nissan R 391. (152 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mercedes-Benz CLC should accelerate faster than 1999 Nissan R 391.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Nissan R 391 (359 Nm) has 109 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Mercedes-Benz CLC. (250 Nm). This means 1999 Nissan R 391 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Mercedes-Benz CLC. 1999 Nissan R 391 has automatic transmission and 2010 Mercedes-Benz CLC has manual transmission. 2010 Mercedes-Benz CLC will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 Nissan R 391 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Nissan R 391 | 2010 Mercedes-Benz CLC | |
| Make | Nissan | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | R 391 | CLC |
| Year Released | 1999 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 4997 cc | 1795 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 152 HP | 181 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 359 Nm | 250 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 1 seats | 5 seats |
