1999 Nissan R 391 vs. 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Nissan R 391. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Nissan R 391 would be higher. At 4,997 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Nissan R 391 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee (286 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 134 more horse power than 1999 Nissan R 391. (152 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1999 Nissan R 391.
Because 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1999 Nissan R 391. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Nissan R 391 (359 Nm) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (353 Nm). This means 1999 Nissan R 391 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Nissan R 391 | 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
| Make | Nissan | Jeep |
| Model | R 391 | Grand Cherokee |
| Year Released | 1999 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 4997 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 152 HP | 286 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Torque | 359 Nm | 353 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 5-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 1 seats | 5 seats |
