2000 AC Aceca vs. 1947 Alfa Romeo 6C
To start off, 2000 AC Aceca is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1947 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1947 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 3,504 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 AC Aceca (346 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 257 more horse power than 1947 Alfa Romeo 6C. (89 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 1947 Alfa Romeo 6C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 AC Aceca weights approximately 104 kg more than 1947 Alfa Romeo 6C. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 AC Aceca | 1947 Alfa Romeo 6C | |
Make | AC | Alfa Romeo |
Model | Aceca | 6C |
Year Released | 2000 | 1947 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3504 cc | 2443 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 346 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 72 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81 mm | 100 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1610 kg | 1506 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2300 mm | 3010 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 77 L |