2000 AC Aceca vs. 1963 Austin A 90

To start off, 2000 AC Aceca is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Austin A 90. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Austin A 90 would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 AC Aceca (301 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 181 more horse power than 1963 Austin A 90. (120 HP @ 4750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 1963 Austin A 90. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Austin A 90 weights approximately 60 kg more than 2000 AC Aceca.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 AC Aceca (407 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 186 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Austin A 90. (221 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 2000 AC Aceca will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Austin A 90.

Compare all specifications:

2000 AC Aceca 1963 Austin A 90
Make AC Austin
Model Aceca A 90
Year Released 2000 1963
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4600 cc 2912 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 301 HP 120 HP
Engine RPM 5800 RPM 4750 RPM
Torque 407 Nm 221 Nm
Torque RPM 4800 RPM 2750 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 2 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1510 kg 1570 kg
Vehicle Length 4430 mm 4780 mm
Vehicle Width 1880 mm 1750 mm
Vehicle Height 1310 mm 1540 mm
Wheelbase Size 2480 mm 2750 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 90 L 34 L