2000 AC Aceca vs. 1999 Renault Zo
To start off, 2000 AC Aceca is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Renault Zo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Renault Zo would be higher. At 3,504 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 AC Aceca (346 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 272 more horse power than 1999 Renault Zo. (74 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 1999 Renault Zo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 AC Aceca weights approximately 35 kg more than 1999 Renault Zo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 AC Aceca (400 Nm) has 140 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Renault Zo. (260 Nm). This means 2000 AC Aceca will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Renault Zo.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 AC Aceca | 1999 Renault Zo | |
| Make | AC | Renault |
| Model | Aceca | Zo |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 3504 cc | 1999 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 346 HP | 74 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 400 Nm | 260 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1610 kg | 1575 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2300 mm | 2580 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 83 L |
