2000 AC Cobra vs. 1948 Bristol 450
To start off, 2000 AC Cobra is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Bristol 450. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Bristol 450 would be higher. At 3,506 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 AC Cobra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 AC Cobra (350 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 197 more horse power than 1948 Bristol 450. (153 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 AC Cobra should accelerate faster than 1948 Bristol 450. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 AC Cobra weights approximately 170 kg more than 1948 Bristol 450. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 AC Cobra | 1948 Bristol 450 | |
Make | AC | Bristol |
Model | Cobra | 450 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1948 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3506 cc | 1971 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 153 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 66 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81 mm | 96 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 730 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4110 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1210 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2300 mm | 2480 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 54 L |