2000 Acura TL vs. 2011 Chrysler 200
To start off, 2011 Chrysler 200 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Acura TL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Acura TL would be higher. At 3,210 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Acura TL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Acura TL (226 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 53 more horse power than 2011 Chrysler 200. (173 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Acura TL should accelerate faster than 2011 Chrysler 200.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Acura TL (294 Nm @ 4700 RPM) has 69 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Chrysler 200. (225 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2000 Acura TL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Chrysler 200.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Acura TL | 2011 Chrysler 200 | |
Make | Acura | Chrysler |
Model | TL | 200 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3210 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 226 HP | 173 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 294 Nm | 225 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4700 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4869 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1483 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2766 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 64 L |