2000 Alpina B 10 vs. 2011 Volvo C30
To start off, 2011 Volvo C30 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Alpina B 10. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Alpina B 10 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Alpina B 10 weights approximately 289 kg more than 2011 Volvo C30.
Because 2000 Alpina B 10 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Alpina B 10. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Volvo C30, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Alpina B 10 (490 Nm) has 140 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Volvo C30. (350 Nm). This means 2000 Alpina B 10 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Volvo C30.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Alpina B 10 | 2011 Volvo C30 | |
Make | Alpina | Volvo |
Model | B 10 | C30 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2011 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 342 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 490 Nm | 350 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1740 kg | 1451 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4252 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1783 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1448 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2639 mm |