2000 Audi A6 vs. 1989 Cadillac Brougham
To start off, 2000 Audi A6 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 5,032 cc (8 cylinders), 1989 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 400 kg more than 2000 Audi A6.
Because 1989 Cadillac Brougham is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1989 Cadillac Brougham. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Audi A6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Audi A6 | 1989 Cadillac Brougham | |
Make | Audi | Cadillac |
Model | A6 | Brougham |
Year Released | 2000 | 1989 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2496 cc | 5032 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 177 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1550 kg | 1950 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 5630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1950 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 3090 mm |