2000 BMW 320 vs. 1966 Buick Electra
To start off, 2000 BMW 320 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Buick Electra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Buick Electra would be higher. At 6,572 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Buick Electra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Buick Electra (275 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 105 more horse power than 2000 BMW 320. (170 HP @ 6250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Buick Electra should accelerate faster than 2000 BMW 320. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Buick Electra weights approximately 400 kg more than 2000 BMW 320. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 BMW 320 | 1966 Buick Electra | |
Make | BMW | Buick |
Model | 320 | Electra |
Year Released | 2000 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2171 cc | 6572 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 170 HP | 275 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1630 kg | 2030 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 5670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1990 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 3210 mm |