2000 BMW 323 vs. 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee

To start off, 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 BMW 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 BMW 323 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 BMW 323 (326 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (286 HP @ 6400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 BMW 323 should accelerate faster than 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 754 kg more than 2000 BMW 323.

Because 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 BMW 323. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee (353 Nm) has 108 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 BMW 323. (245 Nm). This means 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 BMW 323.

Compare all specifications:

2000 BMW 323 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee
Make BMW Jeep
Model 323 Grand Cherokee
Year Released 2000 2013
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2499 cc 3600 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 326 HP 286 HP
Engine RPM 7400 RPM 6400 RPM
Torque 245 Nm 353 Nm
Drive Type Rear AWD
Transmission Type Automatic 5-speed automatic
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1610 kg 2364 kg
Vehicle Length 4480 mm 4821 mm
Vehicle Width 1750 mm 2154 mm
Vehicle Height 1420 mm 1763 mm
Wheelbase Size 2840 mm 2916 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 70 L 93 L