2000 BMW Z3 vs. 1968 Lotus Elan
To start off, 2000 BMW Z3 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 2,171 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 BMW Z3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 BMW Z3 (167 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 1968 Lotus Elan. (104 HP @ 6250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 BMW Z3 should accelerate faster than 1968 Lotus Elan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 BMW Z3 weights approximately 525 kg more than 1968 Lotus Elan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 BMW Z3 | 1968 Lotus Elan | |
Make | BMW | Lotus |
Model | Z3 | Elan |
Year Released | 2000 | 1968 |
Body Type | Convertible | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2171 cc | 1558 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 167 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1345 kg | 820 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 4290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1200 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2440 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 51 L | 59 L |