2000 BMW Z8 vs. 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk
To start off, 2000 BMW Z8 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk would be higher. At 4,939 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 BMW Z8 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 BMW Z8 weights approximately 285 kg more than 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 BMW Z8 | 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk | |
Make | BMW | Studebaker |
Model | Z8 | Sky Hawk |
Year Released | 2000 | 1959 |
Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4939 cc | 2779 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 400 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1585 kg | 1300 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 5150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2980 mm |