2000 Caterham 21 vs. 2001 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2001 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Caterham 21. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Caterham 21 would be higher. At 2,501 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2001 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Caterham 21. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Caterham 21 (210 Nm) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Jeep Wrangler. (190 Nm). This means 2000 Caterham 21 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Jeep Wrangler.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Caterham 21 | 2001 Jeep Wrangler | |
| Make | Caterham | Jeep |
| Model | 21 | Wrangler |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1794 cc | 2501 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 230 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 210 Nm | 190 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 98.3 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 89.3 mm | 81 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 3860 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 2380 mm |
