2000 Caterham C21 vs. 2011 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2011 Holden Cruze is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Caterham C21. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Caterham C21 would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Holden Cruze is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Holden Cruze (161 HP) has 46 more horse power than 2000 Caterham C21. (115 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Holden Cruze should accelerate faster than 2000 Caterham C21.
Because 2000 Caterham C21 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Caterham C21. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Holden Cruze, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Holden Cruze (360 Nm) has 215 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Caterham C21. (145 Nm). This means 2011 Holden Cruze will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Caterham C21.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Caterham C21 | 2011 Holden Cruze | |
| Make | Caterham | Holden |
| Model | C21 | Cruze |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1588 cc | 1991 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 115 HP | 161 HP |
| Torque | 145 Nm | 360 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3810 mm | 4597 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1788 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1060 mm | 1477 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2685 mm |
