2000 Chevrolet Astro vs. 1954 Studebaker Commander
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Astro is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Studebaker Commander. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Studebaker Commander would be higher. At 4,300 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Astro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Studebaker Commander weights approximately 233 kg more than 2000 Chevrolet Astro.
Because 2000 Chevrolet Astro is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1954 Studebaker Commander. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Astro will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chevrolet Astro | 1954 Studebaker Commander | |
Make | Chevrolet | Studebaker |
Model | Astro | Commander |
Year Released | 2000 | 1954 |
Body Type | Minivan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4300 cc | 3673 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 140 HP |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1187 kg | 1420 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 5200 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1940 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 3070 mm |