2000 Chevrolet Astro vs. 1974 Rover 3.5
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Astro is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Rover 3.5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Rover 3.5 would be higher. At 4,300 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Astro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1974 Rover 3.5 weights approximately 451 kg more than 2000 Chevrolet Astro.
Because 2000 Chevrolet Astro is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1974 Rover 3.5. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Astro will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chevrolet Astro (339 Nm) has 63 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Rover 3.5. (276 Nm). This means 2000 Chevrolet Astro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Rover 3.5.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chevrolet Astro | 1974 Rover 3.5 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Rover |
Model | Astro | 3.5 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1974 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4300 cc | 3532 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 149 HP |
Torque | 339 Nm | 276 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1187 kg | 1638 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1940 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2820 mm |