2000 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1964 Trabant P 601
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Trabant P 601. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Trabant P 601 would be higher. At 5,670 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 925 kg more than 1964 Trabant P 601.
Because 2000 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 Trabant P 601, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chevrolet Camaro (468 Nm) has 415 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Trabant P 601. (53 Nm). This means 2000 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Trabant P 601.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chevrolet Camaro | 1964 Trabant P 601 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Trabant |
Model | Camaro | P 601 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5670 cc | 595 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 23 HP |
Torque | 468 Nm | 53 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1540 kg | 615 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 3560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1520 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2030 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 24 L |