2000 Chevrolet S-10 vs. 2005 GMC Safari
To start off, 2005 GMC Safari is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chevrolet S-10. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chevrolet S-10 would be higher. At 4,294 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 GMC Safari is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 GMC Safari (190 HP) has 71 more horse power than 2000 Chevrolet S-10. (119 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 GMC Safari should accelerate faster than 2000 Chevrolet S-10. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 GMC Safari weights approximately 485 kg more than 2000 Chevrolet S-10. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 GMC Safari (339 Nm) has 149 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Chevrolet S-10. (190 Nm). This means 2005 GMC Safari will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Chevrolet S-10.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chevrolet S-10 | 2005 GMC Safari | |
Make | Chevrolet | GMC |
Model | S-10 | Safari |
Year Released | 2000 | 2005 |
Body Type | Pickup | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2196 cc | 4294 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 119 HP | 190 HP |
Torque | 190 Nm | 339 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1470 kg | 1955 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5210 mm | 4830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1600 mm | 1910 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3130 mm | 2830 mm |