2000 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1974 Mazda 110 S
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Mazda 110 S. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Mazda 110 S would be higher. At 1,964 cc, 1974 Mazda 110 S is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1974 Mazda 110 S (108 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 2000 Chevrolet Tracker. (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1974 Mazda 110 S should accelerate faster than 2000 Chevrolet Tracker.
Let's talk about torque, 1974 Mazda 110 S (143 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 4 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Chevrolet Tracker. (139 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1974 Mazda 110 S will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Chevrolet Tracker.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chevrolet Tracker | 1974 Mazda 110 S | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Tracker | 110 S |
Year Released | 2000 | 1974 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1590 cc | 1964 cc |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 139 Nm | 143 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 4140 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1610 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1180 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2360 mm |