2000 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1984 Citroen GSA
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Citroen GSA. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Citroen GSA would be higher. At 1,590 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chevrolet Tracker (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 1984 Citroen GSA. (56 HP @ 5750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1984 Citroen GSA.
Because 2000 Chevrolet Tracker is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Chevrolet Tracker. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Citroen GSA, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chevrolet Tracker | 1984 Citroen GSA | |
Make | Chevrolet | Citroen |
Model | Tracker | GSA |
Year Released | 2000 | 1984 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1590 cc | 1129 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 56 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 4190 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2560 mm |