2000 Citroen C5 vs. 2004 Ford F-150
To start off, 2004 Ford F-150 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Citroen C5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Citroen C5 would be higher. At 5,407 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford F-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford F-150 (380 HP) has 321 more horse power than 2000 Citroen C5. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford F-150 should accelerate faster than 2000 Citroen C5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford F-150 weights approximately 5 kg more than 2000 Citroen C5. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford F-150 (610 Nm) has 495 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Citroen C5. (115 Nm). This means 2004 Ford F-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Citroen C5.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Citroen C5 | 2004 Ford F-150 | |
Make | Citroen | Ford |
Model | C5 | F-150 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2004 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 5407 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 380 HP |
Torque | 115 Nm | 610 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 85 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 106 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.4:1 | 8.4:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1318 kg | 1323 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 5290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2920 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 6 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 10.3 L/100km | 18.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.5 L/100km | 16.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 95 L |