2000 Daewoo Musiro vs. 1952 Renault Juva
To start off, 2000 Daewoo Musiro is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Renault Juva. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Renault Juva would be higher. At 2,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Daewoo Musiro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Daewoo Musiro (105 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 81 more horse power than 1952 Renault Juva. (24 HP @ 3500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Daewoo Musiro should accelerate faster than 1952 Renault Juva. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Daewoo Musiro weights approximately 225 kg more than 1952 Renault Juva. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Daewoo Musiro | 1952 Renault Juva | |
| Make | Daewoo | Renault |
| Model | Musiro | Juva |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1952 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 2500 cc | 1003 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 105 HP | 24 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1035 kg | 810 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4260 mm | 3610 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1410 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2360 mm |
