2000 Daewoo Rezzo vs. 1975 Volvo 66
To start off, 2000 Daewoo Rezzo is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 1,761 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Daewoo Rezzo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Daewoo Rezzo (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 1975 Volvo 66. (56 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Daewoo Rezzo should accelerate faster than 1975 Volvo 66.
Because 1975 Volvo 66 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1975 Volvo 66. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Daewoo Rezzo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Daewoo Rezzo (149 Nm) has 55 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Volvo 66. (94 Nm). This means 2000 Daewoo Rezzo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Volvo 66.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Daewoo Rezzo | 1975 Volvo 66 | |
| Make | Daewoo | Volvo |
| Model | Rezzo | 66 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1975 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1761 cc | 1289 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 97 HP | 56 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 149 Nm | 94 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 80.5 mm | 73 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 86.5 mm | 77 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4360 mm | 3910 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1550 mm |
