2000 Dodge Durango vs. 1966 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 2000 Dodge Durango is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 4,687 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Dodge Durango is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Dodge Durango weights approximately 675 kg more than 1966 Suzuki Fronte.
Because 2000 Dodge Durango is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Suzuki Fronte. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Dodge Durango will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Dodge Durango (400 Nm) has 319 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Suzuki Fronte. (81 Nm). This means 2000 Dodge Durango will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Dodge Durango | 1966 Suzuki Fronte | |
| Make | Dodge | Suzuki |
| Model | Durango | Fronte |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1966 |
| Engine Size | 4687 cc | 785 cc |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 35 HP |
| Torque | 400 Nm | 81 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Number of Seats | 8 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1435 kg | 760 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 3880 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2250 mm |
