2000 Ford Econoline vs. 2011 Land Rover Freelander
To start off, 2011 Land Rover Freelander is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Econoline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Econoline would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Econoline (197 HP @ 4700 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 2011 Land Rover Freelander. (189 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Econoline should accelerate faster than 2011 Land Rover Freelander.
Because 2011 Land Rover Freelander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Ford Econoline. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Land Rover Freelander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Land Rover Freelander (420 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 82 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford Econoline. (338 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 2011 Land Rover Freelander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford Econoline.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Ford Econoline | 2011 Land Rover Freelander | |
Make | Ford | Land Rover |
Model | Econoline | Freelander |
Year Released | 2000 | 2011 |
Body Type | Van | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 2179 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 189 HP |
Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 338 Nm | 420 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 2030 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2670 mm |