2000 Ford TS-50 vs. 1965 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2000 Ford TS-50 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 4,733 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Ford Mustang (208 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 80 more horse power than 2000 Ford TS-50. (128 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1965 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford TS-50. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford TS-50 weights approximately 43 kg more than 1965 Ford Mustang.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford TS-50 | 1965 Ford Mustang | |
| Make | Ford | Ford |
| Model | TS-50 | Mustang |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1989 cc | 4733 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 128 HP | 208 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1208 kg | 1165 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2750 mm |
