2000 Ford Windstar vs. 2012 Suzuki Equator
To start off, 2012 Suzuki Equator is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Windstar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Windstar would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Windstar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 150 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar.
Because 2012 Suzuki Equator is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Suzuki Equator. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Ford Windstar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Ford Windstar | 2012 Suzuki Equator | |
| Make | Ford | Suzuki |
| Model | Windstar | Equator |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Minivan | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3000 cc | 2501 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 150 HP | 150 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 5103 mm | 5250 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1946 mm | 1860 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1679 mm | 1790 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3066 mm | 3200 mm |
