2000 GMC Safari vs. 2002 BMW X5
To start off, 2002 BMW X5 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 GMC Safari. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 GMC Safari would be higher. At 4,294 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 GMC Safari is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 BMW X5 (226 HP) has 36 more horse power than 2000 GMC Safari. (190 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2002 BMW X5 should accelerate faster than 2000 GMC Safari. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 GMC Safari weights approximately 341 kg more than 2002 BMW X5.
Because 2002 BMW X5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 GMC Safari. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 BMW X5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 GMC Safari (319 Nm) has 29 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 BMW X5. (290 Nm). This means 2000 GMC Safari will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 BMW X5.
Compare all specifications:
2000 GMC Safari | 2002 BMW X5 | |
Make | GMC | BMW |
Model | Safari | X5 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2002 |
Body Type | Van | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4294 cc | 2926 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 226 HP |
Torque | 319 Nm | 290 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1956 kg | 1615 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1940 mm | 1710 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2890 mm |