2000 GMC Sierra vs. 2011 Kia Cadenza
To start off, 2011 Kia Cadenza is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 GMC Sierra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 GMC Sierra would be higher. At 4,293 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 GMC Sierra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Kia Cadenza (290 HP) has 93 more horse power than 2000 GMC Sierra. (197 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Kia Cadenza should accelerate faster than 2000 GMC Sierra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 GMC Sierra weights approximately 200 kg more than 2011 Kia Cadenza.
Because 2000 GMC Sierra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Kia Cadenza. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 GMC Sierra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2011 Kia Cadenza has automatic transmission and 2000 GMC Sierra has manual transmission. 2000 GMC Sierra will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 Kia Cadenza will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 GMC Sierra | 2011 Kia Cadenza | |
Make | GMC | Kia |
Model | Sierra | Cadenza |
Year Released | 2000 | 2011 |
Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4293 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 290 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1775 kg | 1575 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5170 mm | 4965 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1475 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2845 mm |