2000 GMC Yukon vs. 2013 Cadillac ATS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac ATS is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 GMC Yukon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 GMC Yukon would be higher. At 5,300 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 GMC Yukon is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 GMC Yukon weights approximately 385 kg more than 2013 Cadillac ATS.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 GMC Yukon (442 Nm) has 69 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Cadillac ATS. (373 Nm). This means 2000 GMC Yukon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Cadillac ATS.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 GMC Yukon | 2013 Cadillac ATS | |
| Make | GMC | Cadillac |
| Model | Yukon | ATS |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2013 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 5300 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 317 HP |
| Torque | 442 Nm | 373 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1955 kg | 1570 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 4643 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1806 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1417 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2990 mm | 2776 mm |
