2000 Holden GTS-R vs. 2011 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2011 Ford Ranger is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Holden GTS-R. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Holden GTS-R would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Holden GTS-R is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2011 Ford Ranger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2011 Ford Ranger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Holden GTS-R, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Holden GTS-R (644 Nm) has 322 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Ford Ranger. (322 Nm). This means 2000 Holden GTS-R will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Ford Ranger.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Holden GTS-R | 2011 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Holden | Ford |
Model | GTS-R | Ranger |
Year Released | 2000 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5000 cc | 4000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 207 HP |
Torque | 644 Nm | 322 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |