2000 Holden HRT vs. 1959 Holden FE
To start off, 2000 Holden HRT is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Holden FE. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Holden FE would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Holden HRT is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1959 Holden FE is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Holden FE. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Holden HRT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Holden HRT (815 Nm) has 665 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Holden FE. (150 Nm). This means 2000 Holden HRT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Holden FE.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Holden HRT | 1959 Holden FE | |
| Make | Holden | Holden |
| Model | HRT | FE |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1959 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5000 cc | 2166 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 60 HP |
| Torque | 815 Nm | 150 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
