2000 Holden HRT vs. 1982 Mercury Grand Marquis
To start off, 2000 Holden HRT is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mercury Grand Marquis. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mercury Grand Marquis would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Holden HRT is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1982 Mercury Grand Marquis is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Mercury Grand Marquis. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Holden HRT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Holden HRT (815 Nm) has 553 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Mercury Grand Marquis. (262 Nm). This means 2000 Holden HRT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Mercury Grand Marquis.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Holden HRT | 1982 Mercury Grand Marquis | |
| Make | Holden | Mercury |
| Model | HRT | Grand Marquis |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5000 cc | 4186 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 118 HP |
| Torque | 815 Nm | 262 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
