2000 Holden HRT vs. 1992 Mitsubishi 3000GT
To start off, 2000 Holden HRT is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Mitsubishi 3000GT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Mitsubishi 3000GT would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Holden HRT is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1992 Mitsubishi 3000GT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Holden HRT. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Mitsubishi 3000GT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Holden HRT (815 Nm) has 534 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Mitsubishi 3000GT. (281 Nm). This means 2000 Holden HRT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Mitsubishi 3000GT.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Holden HRT | 1992 Mitsubishi 3000GT | |
| Make | Holden | Mitsubishi |
| Model | HRT | 3000GT |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1992 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5000 cc | 2970 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 221 HP |
| Torque | 815 Nm | 281 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
