2000 Holden HRT vs. 1994 Mazda 626
To start off, 2000 Holden HRT is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Holden HRT is equipped with a bigger engine.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Holden HRT (815 Nm) has 648 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Mazda 626. (167 Nm). This means 2000 Holden HRT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Mazda 626.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Holden HRT | 1994 Mazda 626 | |
Make | Holden | Mazda |
Model | HRT | 626 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1994 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5000 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 108 HP |
Torque | 815 Nm | 167 Nm |