2000 Holden HRT vs. 2004 Mazda Laputa
To start off, 2004 Mazda Laputa is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Holden HRT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Holden HRT would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Holden HRT is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Holden HRT (815 Nm) has 754 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mazda Laputa. (61 Nm). This means 2000 Holden HRT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mazda Laputa. 2004 Mazda Laputa has automatic transmission and 2000 Holden HRT has manual transmission. 2000 Holden HRT will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 Mazda Laputa will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Holden HRT | 2004 Mazda Laputa | |
| Make | Holden | Mazda |
| Model | HRT | Laputa |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5000 cc | 658 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 52 HP |
| Torque | 815 Nm | 61 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
